Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Oregon v. Mobil Oil Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1975PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is a proceeding under ORS 27.010 for the submission of a controversy for decision by the trial court, without a jury, based upon an agreed statement of the case. Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment.

The controversy involves the interpretation of the prolusions of a lease. More particularly, the question is whether defendant gave timely notice to renew the lease in accordance with a provision which required that such notice be given “at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the then current term.” ①

The expiration date of the lease was April 30,1974. The 30th day prior to that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Capital Lumbering Co. v. LearnedOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Tucker v. ThravesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. State Ex Rel. Earley v. BatchelorWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. In re RiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Turnbow v. KellerOregon Supreme Court · 1933

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. Georgia Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. Swiss Bank Corporation and O'COnnOr Investments v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  4. State v. TasichNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Jones v. Georgia Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API