Legal Opinion
Charles TESTERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EDS TECHNICAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 21, 1996No. 96-1197PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
Charles Testerman brought this suit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., alleging that when EDS Technical Products Corporation (“EDS”) trimmed its workforce in 1993, the company unlawfully considered Testerman’s age in deciding to include him among those employees sacrificed to the bottom line. After a thorough review of the evidence, the district court granted summary judgment for EDS. Only the ADEA claim is presented on this appeal, and we affirm.
I
Mr.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Elizabeth Castro v. DeVry University, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Molly Joll v. Valparaiso Community SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- John Balderston and John Gabriel v. Fairbanks Morse Engine Division of Coltec Industries, 1Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Christopher J. Michas v. Health Cost Controls of Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.