Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Harris

Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco

Decided November 18, 1908No. 2,853Published

Contest to probate of will; demurrer to contest.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.

Contestants insist that this court has jurisdiction where a guardian ad litem appears for minors and cites sections 872 and 373 of the Code of Civil Procedure and certain cases in support of this claim; but the supreme court, iu the Matter of Carpenter, 75 Cal. 596, seemed to hold the contrary, saying that they did not think the provisions referred to applied to probate proceedings. At that time, however, section 1718, Code of Civil Procedure, was in existence, and there was no necessity for a guardian ad litem, if the trial court in a will contest exercised its power to appoint an attorney…

2Cases cited114 opinions

  1. In re Estate of McDevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Kingsbury v. BucknerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Wilson v. McConnachieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. In re Organization & of the Bonds of the Central Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Fernandes v. Sacramento City Ry.California Supreme Court · 1877

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API