Legal Opinion
First Mortgage Corp. v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.
District Court, D. Utah
Decided November 27, 2001No. 2:01-cv-00201PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendant State Street Bank and Trust’s (“State Street”) motion to dismiss the complaint of Plaintiff First Mortgage Corporation (“First Mortgage”) for lack of personal jurisdiction. Having considered the arguments made by counsel at a September 17, 2001 hearing, as well as applicable case law, the court grants State Street’s motion to dismiss.
Standard of Review
The plaintiff in a civil case bears the burden of establishing that the court has personal jurisdiction over the defendant. See OMI Holdings, Inc. v. Royal Ins. Co. of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fenn v. Mleads Enterprises, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2006
- Capitol Federal Savings Bank v. Eastern Bank Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Hydro Engineering, Inc. v. Landa, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2002
- DP Creations v. Ke Yi Ke Er Shenzhen ToysDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024