Fenn v. Mleads Enterprises, Inc.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Associate Chief Justice:
T1 In this case, we are asked to consider whether due process permits a Utah court to exert personal jurisdiction over a defendant who sends an email without knowledge of the residence of the recipient or the location at which the recipient will retrieve the message. The court of appeals concluded that Utah may exert jurisdiction under the given circumstances in this case. We disagree and reverse.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
T2 When determining whether the trial court correctly granted a motion to dismiss, we " 'accept the factual…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- XMission, L.C. v. FluentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Giusti v. Sterling Wentworth Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
- Pohl, Inc. of America v. WebelhuthUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
- Clayton v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.