In re Charle Chiedu E.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*1141The Family Court’s determination that the consent of the biological father, Chiedu E., to the adoption of the subject child was required was not supported by the record before it (see Lehr v Robertson, 463 US 248, 262 [1983]; Matter of Robert O. v Russell K., 80 NY2d 254, 262 [1992]; Matter of Raquel Marie X., 76 NY2d 387, 401 [1990], cert denied sub nom. Robert C. v Miguel T., 498 US 984 [1990]; Matter of Joseph Kenneth B., 47 AD3d 809 [2008]; Matter of Baby Boy C., 13 AD3d 619, 620-621 [2004]). The biological father failed to meet his burden of establishing that he maintained substantial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In re Raquel Marie X.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Robert O. v. Russell K.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- In re Peter H. T.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- In re Marc Jaleel G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of Ginelle T.A. (Rondale J.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re Jasiah T.-V.S.J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Jasiah T.-V.S.J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Michael A.B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re Michael A.B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.