Legal Opinion
Brady Schmitendorf v. Juicy’s Vapor Lounge, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided October 21, 2025No. 2:22-cv-02293Unknown
1Opinion
In the United States District Court for the District of Kansas _____________ Case No. 22-cv-02293-TC-GEB _____________ BRADY SCHMITENDORF, Plaintiff v. JUICY’S VAPOR LOUNGE, INC., Defendant _____________ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Brady Schmitendorf brought this putative class action against Juicy’s Vapor Lounge, asserting that Juicy’s sent him and others similarly situated unwanted text messages in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227. Doc. 1. Schmitendorf now moves to certify a class. Doc. 72. For the following reasons, Schmiten- dorf’s motion is denied. I…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.