Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Hough

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 17, 1908PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On motion for a preliminary injunction. Heard on bill and affidavits and answer and affidavits, and order to show cause.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Y. C.

The bill in this cause was filed for the specific performance of an agreement for the sale of lands entered into by Willis P. Bainbridge, Esq., as agent and attorney in fact for the defendants, Horace G. Hough and Edith Hough, administratrix, with Alexander Campbell, the complainant. The agreement is in writing under date of October 5th, 1907, and recites that the sale is to be made in consideration of $6,000; part thereof, $600, being paid to Mr. Bainbridge upon its execution; $2,200 to be paid December 5th, 1907; and the balance, $3,200 to be satisfied by the assumption bjt Mr.…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ward v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Konsuvo v. NetzkeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  3. Crowell v. GouldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  4. J. D. Best & Co. v. Wolf Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  5. Golfinopoulos v. PadulaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API