Legal Opinion

Konsuvo v. Netzke

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 27, 1966PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

91 N.J. Super. 353 (1966)

220 A.2d 424

PETER KONSUVO, PLAINTIFF,

v.

ROBERT NETZKE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. FRANK CIKUTOVICH, JR., AND THOMAS CIKUTOVICH, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

PETER KONSUVO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided May 27, 1966.

Mr. N. Patrick Quirk, attorney for Peter Konsuvo.

Messrs. Breslin & Breslin, attorneys for Frank Cikutovich, Jr. and Thomas Cikutovich (Mr. Charles Rodgers, appearing).

Mr. John Tomasin, attorney for American Insulation Corp. and American Insulation Sales Co., Inc.

Messrs. Major & Major, attorneys for Vincent Dragich.

LORA, J.S.C.

These are…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Slack v. ReesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  3. Pomeroy v. BentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  4. Rubenstein v. RubensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. Argus Co. v. . Mayor, Etc., of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ala, Inc. v. Ccair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Walter v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. Smith v. Township of LivingstonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  4. Massey v. Trump's Castle Hotel & CasinoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  5. Thomas v. PrewittMississippi Supreme Court · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API