Legal Opinion
Dorf v. Complastik Corp.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided August 19, 1999PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.
[¶ 1] Michael Dorf appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Oxford County, Perkins, A.R.J.) dismissing his complaint against Complastik Corpo ration and David Evans, nonresident defendants, for insufficient service of process and lack of personal jurisdiction. Dorf contends that the court erred by dismissing his complaint because service of process was sufficient, at least as to Com-plastik, and because his complaint and supporting affidavit establish a prima fa-cie case that Complastik and Evans, through their conduct, availed themselves of jurisdiction in Maine pursuant to its…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Cutco Industries, Inc. v. Dennis E. NaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Robert S. Boit v. Gar-Tec Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Foster-Miller, Inc. v. Babcock & Wilcox CanadaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bickford v. Onslow Memorial Hospital Foundation, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- R.C. Moore, Inc. v. Les-Care Kitchens, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- Gutierrez v. GutierrezSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- In re Emma B.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- State of Maine v. SEKAP, CIGARETTENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.