Legal Opinion

Stamberger v. Matthaidess

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The issue is: Are the allegations of the complaints sufficient to state a cause of action for negligent breach of a duty by the defendant, Carthage College?

It is conceded, as it must be, that the legal relationship of Carthage College and the plaintiff, Larry Stamberger, and the defendant, Gayle Kruescher, was that of invitor-invitee. The duty owed to an invitee by an invitor has been stated to be as follows:

“ ‘A possessor of land is subject to liability to others who are privileged to enter it for a public or private purpose, irrespective of his consent, for bodily harm there caused to them…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Marquardt v. CernockyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  2. Guderyon v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Schlicht v. ThesingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Schubart v. Hotel Astor, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Tantillo v. Goldstein Brothers Amusement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Korenak v. Curative Workshop Adult Rehabilitation CenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Kretchman v. ReidWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Henkel v. PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API