Legal Opinion

Stearnes v. Woodall

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 28, 1928No. 8 Div. 6PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The appellant, claiming to be an heir at law of Simon Ross, filed the original bill against the other heirs at law of said Ross, and the appellee, Oscar Woodall, who is alleged to have succeeded to a life estate vested in Henry Winston, the husband of one of the deceased heirs, to have the value of that interest determined, and the lands sold for division among the joint owners.

Woodall answered, asserting that he was the sole owner of the property, making his answer a cross-bill, and praying that his title be quieted as against the claims of the parties to the suit.

The complainant filed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kidd v. BorumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Gordon, Rankin & Co. v. TweedySupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Locklin v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Normant v. Eureka Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Ashe-Carson Co. v. BonifaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Smith v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Fitts v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Talley v. TalleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Morris v. YanceySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. Barry v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API