Legal Opinion
O'Neil Engineering Co. v. City of San Augustine
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 10, 1914No. 6647PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from District Court, San Augustine Comity; A. E. Davis, Judge. Action by the City of San Augustine and others against the O’Neil Engineering Company and others. From a judgment "for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
PLEASANTS, C. J,
In December, 1908, appellee, as party of the first part, entered into a contract with appellant engineering company, the material parts of which are as follows:
“That the said party of the first part has this day employed the party of the second part as supervising and constructing engineers to prepare plans and specifications for the construction of a system of waterworks, to be erected and constructed in the city of San Augustine, San Augustine county, Tex., upon the following terms and conditions:
“First. The said party of the second part shall prepare and finish complete…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. WadsackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Cleburne St. Ry. Co. v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Ford Motor Co. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Conn v. Houston Oil Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- City of Texarkana v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Capitol Hotel Co. v. RittenberryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Westbrook v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HigginbothamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Langford v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Waterman Lumber & Supply Co. v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.