Legal Opinion

Westbrook v. Watts

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 29, 1954No. 3165PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIREY, Justice.

Plaintiff brought this suit to recover the balance due upon a written contract for the drilling of an oil well and other obligations due him in connection with the completion of the contract. He. itemized and verified his claim according to Rule 185, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended. The jury in its verdict found that the surface casing furnished by defendants for the first well was defective and that it was a proximate cause of the loss of the hole, and that plaintiff’s employees ran the first string of surface casing in the well in a good and workmanlike manner. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. ScharrenbeckTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Texas Power & Light Co. v. HeringTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Texas Employers Insurance v. McKayTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Panhandle Gravel Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Norman v. Apache Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. City of Austin v. Houston Lighting & Power Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  3. Merit Drilling Co. v. Honish, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
  4. Webb v. City of LubbockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Triton Oil & Gas Corporation v. EW Moran Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API