Legal Opinion

Easton v. Aramark Uniform and Career

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 6, 2002No. 1D01-2952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

825 So.2d 996 (2002)

Samuel EASTON, Jr., Appellant,

v.

ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER, etc., et al., Appellee.

No. 1D01-2952.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 6, 2002.

Rehearing Denied September 13, 2002.

Deborah D. Walters, Esquire, The Waters Law Firm, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Vincent J. Profaci, Esquire, Altamonte Springs, for Appellee.

POLSTON, J.

Appellant Samuel Easton, Jr., seeks damages and injunctive relief arising from the prior and ongoing migration of contaminated groundwater from commercial property owned by Appellee Aramark Uniform and Career and its predecessors…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Anchor Hocking Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Mostoufi v. Presto Food Stores, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Kaplan v. PetersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. Seminole County v. Grace Properties No. 7, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. ARAMARK UNIFORM AND APPAREL v. EastonSupreme Court of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API