ARAMARK UNIFORM AND APPAREL v. Easton
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
894 So.2d 20 (2004)
ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPAREL, INC., et al., Petitioners,
v.
Samuel EASTON, Jr., Respondent.
No. SC02-2190.
Supreme Court of Florida.
October 7, 2004.
Rehearing Denied February 8, 2005.
Vincent J. Profaci, Altamonte Springs, FL, for Petitioner.
Deborah D. Walters of The Walters Law Firm, Jacksonville, FL, for Respondent.
CANTERO, J.
We must decide whether a statute that allows suits for damages resulting from pollution creates a cause of action imposing liability without proof that the defendant caused the pollution, or merely modifies existing common law causes of action, which…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- State v. GlatzmayerSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Acosta v. RichterSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- L.B. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. McRobertsSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Kasischke v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Deparvine v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- QBE Insurance Corp. v. Chalfonte Condominium Apartment Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Magaly Pinares v. United Technologies CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Annette Florence v. Crescent Resources, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.