Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Peterson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 31, 1996No. 94-1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

674 So.2d 201 (1996)

Bernard KAPLAN, Appellant,

v.

Kenneth PETERSON, et al., Appellees.

No. 94-1926.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

May 31, 1996.

William L. Pence and Robyn D. Neely of Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees Otis L. Phelps and Carol D. Phelps.

No Appearance for Appellee Kenneth Peterson.

W. SHARP, Judge.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether a current owner of commercial real property can recover from the prior owners who allegedly caused the damage, the expenses and costs of cleaning up the property required by the state or city, which…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Johnson v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LaforetSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  4. Lowry v. Parole and Probation Com'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  5. City of Evansville, Indiana v. Kentucky Liquid Recycling, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. ARAMARK UNIFORM AND APPAREL v. EastonSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Morgan v. WR Grace & Co.-Conn.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. D & T Properties v. Marina Grande Assoc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  4. Curd v. Mosaic Fertilizer, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  5. JNC Enterprises, Ltd. v. ICP 1, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API