Legal Opinion

Hamlin v. Michigan Seat Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1981No. Docket 54173PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, Opal C. Hamlin, was injured from exposure to a. toxic chemical used in making glue. This chemical, known as Toluene Diisocyanate (TDI), was used in the manufacturing process of Michigan Seat Company’s plant where plaintiff was employed. The result was that plaintiff suffered a sensitized condition which caused severe reaction from even small exposure. The company offered plaintiff work with Jackson Canvas Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of the defendant, at benefits equal to those which she had been receiving at defendant’s plant. TDI was not used at the Jackson Canvas…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Powell v. Casco Nelmor Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Lynch v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Pigue v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Sims v. R. D. Brooks, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Adel v. WiseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Longtin v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  3. Shogren v. Bethesda Lutheran Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Beckman v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Beckman v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API