Legal Opinion · Dissent

Beckman v. John Morrell & Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1990No. 16969Published

1DissentMiller, Chief Justice

While I agree with the majority that the criteria set forth in Cozine v. Midwest Coast Transport, Inc., 454 N.W.2d 548 (S.D.1990), control, I disagree with the majority’s application of that authority to these facts.

I further agree that the first three elements laid out in Cozine, supra, are in dispute in this case. I disagree with the majority’s application of the first two elements as they apply to the facts of this case.

As to the first element (that the employee be unable to return to his usual and customary line of employment), I believe, as did the circuit court, that Morrell clearly and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cozine v. Midwest Coast Transport, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Barkdull v. Homestake Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Talley v. Goodwin Bros. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  4. Christiansen v. Eaton, Yale & Towne, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Hamlin v. Michigan Seat Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API