Legal Opinion

Molloy v. Monsanto

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided June 9, 1994No. Civil No. 1994-30PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, Chief Judge

INTRODUCTION

Like many public and private employers, the Government of the Virgin Islands has established a retirement plan for its employees. The original legislation declared that:

The purpose of such system is to encourage qualified personnel to enter and remain in the service of the Government of the Virgin Islands by establishing an orderly means whereby those who become superannuated or otherwise incapacitated as the result of age or disability, may be retired from service without prejudice and without inflicting a hardship upon the em*166ployees retired, and to enable such employees to…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. West Indian Co., Ltd.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1996
  2. Bellas v. Cbs, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Government Employees Retiremen v. Government of the Virgin IslanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API