Legal Opinion

Smith v. Urethane Installations, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 31, 1985PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

Defendant Urethane Installations, Inc., appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Bangor), affirmed by the Superior Court (Penobscot County), awarding dam ages in the sum of $7,500 to plaintiff Carle-ton R. Smith. On appeal defendant asserts that plaintiffs claim is barred by the statute of limitations, that the District Court employed an inappropriate measure of damages, and that there is insufficient evidence to support the damage award. We reject the first two contentions; however, we find the amount of the damage award to be unsupported by the evidence. We vacate the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Air Heaters, Inc. v. Johnson Electric, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Parsons v. BeaulieuSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Arvida Corp. v. AJ Industries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Parker v. BoothSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sebago, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  2. Lamell Lumber Corp. v. Newstress International, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  3. Lamell Lumber Corp. v. NEWSTRESS INTERN.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  4. In re Trailer & Plumbing SuppliesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  5. Marchesseault v. JacksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API