Legal Opinion

State v. Doyle

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided July 22, 2004No. 13-03-602-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by Justice YÁÑEZ.

The State appeals from the trial court’s grant of defendant/appellee’s motion for mistrial. In two issues, the State contends the trial court abused its discretion by: (1) granting a motion for new trial absent a written and filed motion; and (2) granting a new trial solely because the defendant’s trial counsel died shortly after the jury returned a guilty verdict and before punishment phase began. We affirm.

I. Background

A jury found appellee George Doyle guilty of murder on September 10, 2003. 1 Shortly after the jury delivered its verdict, his court-appointed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ladd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. State v. EvansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. Cuellar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. Boyd, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
  2. Lisa Ann Barfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  3. Pete, Ex Parte AndrewCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. Andrew Pete v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2024
  5. Andrew Pete v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2024

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API