State v. Doyle
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Justice YÁÑEZ.
The State appeals from the trial court’s grant of defendant/appellee’s motion for mistrial. In two issues, the State contends the trial court abused its discretion by: (1) granting a motion for new trial absent a written and filed motion; and (2) granting a new trial solely because the defendant’s trial counsel died shortly after the jury returned a guilty verdict and before punishment phase began. We affirm.
I. Background
A jury found appellee George Doyle guilty of murder on September 10, 2003. 1 Shortly after the jury delivered its verdict, his court-appointed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ladd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- State v. EvansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Cuellar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. Boyd, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- Lisa Ann Barfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Pete, Ex Parte AndrewCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Andrew Pete v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2024
- Andrew Pete v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2024
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.