Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided April 28, 1993No. 1284-92PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CLINTON, Judge.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of indecency with a child and his punishment was assessed at seven years confinement, probated, and a $5000.00 fine. On appeal he contended, inter alia, that the trial court erred to continue on with his trial after having granted a mistrial in the cause. The Texarkana Court of Appeals agreed, holding that once the trial court granted the mistrial, it was without authority to rescind that order, and reversed. Rodriguez v. State, 834 S.W.2d 610 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 1992). We granted the State’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Garcia v. DialCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- English v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- State v. Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- Mathis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Ocon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Awadelkariem v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Joseph Bennard Nichols v. Wayne Scott, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Strong v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
- State v. Boyd, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.