Legal Opinion

Milner v. Eskridge

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 5, 1917No. 8510PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Denver District Court. Hon. John H. Denison, Judge. Department.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Teller.

The plaintiff in error, with, one Bacon and one Edgerton, was defendant in an action by defendant in error to recover upon a promissory note executed by them to the order of Eskridge.

The note bore the following endorsement:

“This note is given to protect and indemnify L. D„ Eskridge on account of endorsing notes of American Ink *432Company for fifteen, hundred dollars, dated the 6th day of March, 1913, to the Hamilton National Bank, in case of non-payment. And this note becomes null and void after payment thereof.

I do hereby accept and agree to the above conditions. L.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. First Nat. Bank of NewtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
  2. Fitch v. HammerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  3. Frink v. PeabodyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Trossman v. PhilipsbornAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  2. Allen v. See. In Re SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  3. Simpson v. MilneColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Cobbey v. PetersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Century Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API