Legal Opinion
Trossman v. Philipsborn
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 8, 2007No. 1-04-0588PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Joseph Gordon
Plaintiff Don C. Trossman originally commenced this action in the chancery division seeking to compel profit distributions due to him from defendants Oak Park Partners, Ltd. (Oak Park Partners), and Burnham Investors, Ltd. (Burnham Investors), in both of which he was a limited partner. Defendants Thomas D. Philipsborn and John J. Lynch filed a counterclaim for pro rata contribution or, in the alternative, a declaration of continuing obligation, to contribute to payments they, through their company, The Philipsborn Company (TPC), made on a guaranty to LaSalle National Bank (LaSalle), pursuant…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re Estate of HooverIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- Jackson Jordan, Inc. v. Leydig, Voit & MayerIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Cates v. CatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ryerson Inc. v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Genzer v. James River Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Young v. Alden Gardens of Waterford, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- Gierum v. Glick (In re Glick)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.