Union Tank & Pipe Co. v. Mammoth Oil Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
OGDEN, J., pro tem .
This is an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon real property. The two defendants other than respondents having defaulted, judgment was entered in favor of appellant as to them. Respondents pleaded the provisions of section 1190 of the Code of Civil Procedure as a defense to appellant’s cause of action as against them, which plea was sustained by the trial court and judgment accordingly entered in favor of respondents. From this portion of the judgment plaintiff appeals.
The claim of lien was filed on September 10, 1930. On December 3, 1930, well within the period of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- de McKinlay v. TuttleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. Stockton Terminal & Eastern RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Hughes Brothers v. HooverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Jeffers v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Hoffman v. KeetonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by14 opinions
- Luverne L. Anderson and Josephine Rodriguez v. Allstate Insurance Company, a California Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Simon v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Wells v. California Tomato Juice, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Grinnell Fire Protection System Co. v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.