Hoffman v. Keeton
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County. N. A. Dorn, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH,C.
—This is an appeal from a judgment foreclosing a mortgage. The appeal is by the defendant Sinsheimer, to whom, subsequently to the execution of the mortgage, and before the commencement of the suit, an undivided half of the mortgaged premises was .conveyed hy the mortgagors, the defendants Keeton. The mortgage and the note secured by it were executed January 1, 1891, and became due two years after date. The suit was commenced December 28, 1896, against the defendants Keeton, and fictitious defendants, John Doe, etc. But by an order made April 13, 1897, reciting that “ the true name of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kittle v. BellegardeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Irving v. CarpentierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- de McKinlay v. TuttleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Farris v. MerrittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Rosencrantz v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Munoz v. PurdyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Day v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Breceda v. GamsbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Balon v. DrostCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.