Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Carpenter Printing Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
KALBFLEISCH, District Judge.
In a memorandum filed March 12, 1963, this Court granted plaintiff a partial summary judgment, holding “(1) that the plaintiff’s patents in question are valid patents, and (2) that some plates were manufactured by Polychrome [Corporation] in violation of those patents.” Plaintiff now has renewed its motion for summary judgment, requesting a permanent injunction greatly expanded in scope from the preliminary injunction currently in effect which enjoins defendants Paul and Ellison Carpenter and the Carpenter Printing Co., Inc. from using presensitized metal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Union Tool Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Bewal, Inc., a Corporation of Kansas and Benjamine C. Edwards, Jr. v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Ranco, Inc. v. GwynnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Sherman, Clay & Co. v. Searchlight Horn Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- Wilson v. Union Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.