Legal Opinion

People of Colorado v. Heckler

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided August 9, 1985No. Civ. A. 75-M-539PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MATSCH, District Judge.

On April 29, 1985, this court ordered the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”) to file a plan of action with the court setting forth the procedures and timetable to be followed in performing the duty required by 42 U.S.C. §§ 1396-1396n as mandated by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in Estate of Smith v. Heckler, 747 F.2d 583 (10th Cir.1984). On June 10,1985, the Secretary filed that plan. On June 19, 1985, the plaintiffs and plaintiffs in intervention filed a response to the Secretary’s plan and a motion for review…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Russell E. Train, in His Official Capacity as Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Zambrana v. CalifanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  4. Heckler v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beverly Health & Rehabilitation Services, Inc. v. ThompsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  2. Estate of Smith v. O'HalloranCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. In Re ESTATE OFCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API