Legal Opinion
Smith v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 10, 1969No. 226, September Term, 1968PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.
These cases before us on appeal present questions with regard to evidence of the identification of an accused at trial and prior to trial, in substance as to the admissibility of such evidence and procedurally as h> the manner in which it is presented.
THF ADMISSIBILITY OF IDENTIFICATION FVIDFNCB
At the time the Wade—Gilbert—Stovall trilogy of opinions were decided by the Supreme Court of the United States 1 it was the general rule in this State that a judicial identification of the accused, made under the impartial eye of the court, was admissible. It was also the general rule that a witness’…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- March v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Webster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Bartram v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.