Commonwealth v. Ross
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtTauro, C.J.
The defendants Ross, Daniels, and Williams appeal under G. L. c. 278, § § 33A-33G, from convictions on nine indictments arising out of an armed robbery of Timothy Lehane, a security guard at Boston University. Each defendant was charged with armed robbery, assault with a dangerous weapon, and assault and battery with intent to murder. .The principal assignments of error argued on appeal'relate to the trial judge’s refusal to suppress the in-court identification of the defendant Daniels by the victim Lehane and the in-court identifications of all three defendants by a witness, Howard Lembeck.…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- United States v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ristaino v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Commonwealth v. SellonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. BotelhoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.