Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ross

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 27, 1972PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTauro, C.J.

The defendants Ross, Daniels, and Williams appeal under G. L. c. 278, § § 33A-33G, from convictions on nine indictments arising out of an armed robbery of Timothy Lehane, a security guard at Boston University. Each defendant was charged with armed robbery, assault with a dangerous weapon, and assault and battery with intent to murder. .The principal assignments of error argued on appeal'relate to the trial judge’s refusal to suppress the in-court identification of the defendant Daniels by the victim Lehane and the in-court identifications of all three defendants by a witness, Howard Lembeck.…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. United States v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Ristaino v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. SellonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. BotelhoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API