Meux v. Trezevant
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County denying a motion to set aside a sale under a decree of foreclosure of a mortgage. J. R. Webb, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER,C.
—Appeal from order denying motion to set aside sale under a decree of foreclosure. The mortgage to plaintiff described as part of the premises mortgaged the following: “The northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of section 33, in township 13 south, of range 21 east, Mount Diablo base and meridian, together with one fourth of one cubic foot of water from the Fresno Canal and Irrigation Company’s canal, appurtenant to said land.”
The decree contained the description precisely as in the mortgage, and after it was prepared and before it was signed, at the request of the judge it was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Connick v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Hudepohl v. Liberty Hill Water & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Heyman v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Hopkins v. WiardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Sargent v. ShumakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Flores v. EMC Mortgage Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Rauer v. HertweckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Herrejon v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.