Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vanderbush v. Smith

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided November 13, 1996No. ARMY MISC No. 9601265Published

1DissentRussell, Judge

I cannot find any basis in law or fact to disagree with the conclusion of the military judge. Therefore, I very respectfully dissent.

The Supreme Court long ago recognized that the principle of continuing attached jurisdiction is an integral part of court-martial jurisdiction created by Congress. Coleman v. Tennessee, 97 U.S. 509, 24 L.Ed. 1118 (1879); Carter v. McClaughry, 183 U.S. 365, 22 S.Ct. 181, 46 L.Ed. 236 (1902); see also Barrett v. Hopkins, 7 F. 312 (C.C.D.Kan. 1881). Thus, it has long been understood that a person’s court-martial status is fixed at the time court-martial proceedings…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Carter v. McClaughrySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Coleman v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. United States v. HowardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  5. United States v. MontesinosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API