Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. Robert John Meyers

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 15, 2014No. A13-1313PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINÍQN

REYES, Judge.

Appellant argues that the district court erred by imposing an Upward durational departure based on an aggravating factor that duplicated an element of his conviction for first-degree assault and an aggravating factor that was riot noticed by the state. Appellant also ai’gues that his Conduct was not significantly more serious than the typical first-degree assault, and, therefore, no substantial and compelling circumstances warranted an upward departure. Because we cohclude that the district court had valid grounds for departure and did not abuse its discretion by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. State v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  4. State v. GellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. State v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Robert John MeyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  2. State of Minnesota v. John Chester Hageman, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API