Legal Opinion
Judge v. Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P. C.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 21, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*149OPINION OF THE COURT
Weiss, J.
The employment agreement in effect on December 31, 1991 between plaintiff and defendant Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P. C. (hereinafter defendant) included in clause 19, entitled "Termination Pay”, a provision for payment of a benefit upon termination of employment, in addition to all other payments terms, to attorneys employed for at least 10 years. The termination benefit amounted to 4/7 of the death benefit to which the employee would have otherwise been entitled had he died on the date employment terminated. The agreement further provided that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Denburg v. Flattau & KlimplNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Cohen v. LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Denburg v. FlattauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Whiteside v. Griffis & Griffis, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
- Scalise Industries, Inc. v. MurdockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Pettingell v. Morrison, Mahoney & MillerMassachusetts Superior Court · 1996
- Tom H. Whiteside v. Griffis & Griffis, a Professional Corporation Griffis, Griffis, Whiteside & Woodward, a Professional Corporation Griffis, Woodward, Colia & Motl, a Professional Corporation, Griffis, Colia, Motl and Junell, a Professional Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995