Legal Opinion

Denburg v. Flattau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Saxe, J.), entered on April 2, 1991, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously modified, on the law, the motion is granted as to the first, second, and third causes of action, the matter is remanded for an accounting, and otherwise affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff-appellant withdrew as a partner of the defendant-respondent law firm in May, 1984. He then became a partner of a competing law firm and represented some of the same clients he had previously represented while at Parker Chapin.

Pursuant to paragraph 11 (b)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cohen v. LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Munyan v. Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & MosleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Denburg v. Flattau & KlimplNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Judge v. Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Denburg v. Flattau & KlimplNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API