Legal Opinion

Monarch Liquor Corp. v. Schenley Distillers Corp.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided July 28, 1941No. Civil Action No. 383PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, District Judge.

Motion to strike first and third causes of action and for summary judgment thereon is denied.

Motion for summary judgment on counterclaim is denied.

An order may be presented.

Plaintiff’s demand for production and inspection is rather broad. However, Rule 34, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, must and should receive a liberal interpretation. I do not agree with defendant’s contention that plaintiff should not inspect until after judgment. All documents containing evidence material to the claim or defense of either party is within the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Alkali Export Ass'n, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
  2. Hawaiian Airlines, Ltd. v. Trans-Pacific Airlines, Ltd.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1948
  3. Rosseau v. LangleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1945
  4. Rosenblum v. DingfelderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API