Legal Opinion

Gaughen v. Kerr

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 15, 1896PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Pocahontas District Court. — Hon. Lot Thomas, Judge. Action for the specific performance of a contract to convey real estate. Decree for plaintiffs, and the defendant, Terrance Doyle, appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

The learned judge who tried the case below, prepared and filed an opinion presenting the facts and conclusions, as follows:

1 *2182 *216“I. Finding of the court. This is an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. The following facts are established with but little conflict: (1) On the 28th day of March, 1889, the defendants, J. C. Kerr and L. W. Moody, entered into a written contract with one Gr. W. Smith, for the sale of land in controversy, for the agreed price of $1,109.85, for which Smith executed his several promissory notes as follows: One for $109.35, and one…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hall v. DelaplaineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Basse v. GalleggerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Iowa Railroad Land v. MickelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  4. Andrew v. ConcannonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  5. Blair Town Lot & Land Co. v. HillisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Graham v. MerchantOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Suburban Homes Co. v. NorthMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Van Dyke v. ColeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908
  5. Fratt v. Daniels-Jones Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API