Legal Opinion

Andrew v. Concannon

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 20, 1888PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Audubon District Cotort. — Hon. A. B. Thornell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, C. J.

— The plaintiff and intervenors are judgment creditors of the defendant Concannon, and the appellants are the holders of the legal title to certain real estate which the plaintiff and intervenors claim in equity belongs to Concannon, or in which he has an interest; and they substantially unite in this action, and seek to subject said real estate to the payment of *252their judgments. The court found that the land in equity belonged to Concannon, but that he was indebted to the appellants therefor. The court also found that the plaintiff and intervenors were entitled to liens on the land for the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dunn v. Zwilling Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  2. Schurz v. SchurzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Gaughen v. KerrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. Brown v. BarngroverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  5. Brutsche v. Incorporated Town of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API