Legal Opinion

Treadwell v. Board of Supervisors

California Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1881No. 7,907PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Application for writ of manda/rrms.

1Opinion of the Court

Sharpstein, J.:

Application for a writ of mandamus to compel the Board of Supervisors of Yolo County to take steps preparatory to the holding of an election on the first Wednesday of September of this year, for the election of certain county officers, as provided in Section 4109 of the Political Code as it stood prior to March 7, 1881, when the Legislature attempted to amend it.

The petitioner insists: 1. That the amendatory Act, if constitutional, does not dispense with the holding of an election this year for the officers enumerated in his petition; 2. That if it does, it is repugnant to that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Bartlet v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
  3. Holbrook v. NicholIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  4. State v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Neuber v. Royal Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Sponogle v. CurnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Fenton v. Markwell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Dillon v. BicknellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API