Legal Opinion

State v. Marrero

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 1, 2000No. AC 19512PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPEAR, J.

The defendant, Gerard Jose Marrero, appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding him in violation of the terms of his probation. The defendant claims that the court improperly (1) failed to state the standard that it used in finding him in violation of probation, (2) found him in violation of probation even though he had not been convicted of any crime and (3) ordered him to serve the balance of his previously suspended sentence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts are relevant to this appeal. On July 19, 1996, the defendant was convicted of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Town of Brookfield v. Candlewood Shores Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. Rosenblit v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Benedetto v. BenedettoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. De ToledoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. Santiago v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. State v. LebrickConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. Kosnik v. BartonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API