Legal Opinion

Whorley v. Koss

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1949No. 8848PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE BOTTOMLY:

Suit in equity to reform contract for sale of land and compel specific performance. Decree for plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.

Plaintiffs, George T. Whorley and P. A. Whorley, are husband and wife. The husband is 70 years of age and possessed of a very limited education, not having gone beyond the fourth grade in school. The wife is aged, and so crippled that it was considered almost impossible to get her into the courtroom.

Plaintiffs owned 2,400 acres of deeded lands in Phillips county, Montana. Their day being almost done plaintiffs determined to sell their holdings.

On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parchen v. ChessmanMontana Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Cook-Reynolds Co. v. BeyerMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Thielbar Realties, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. American Mining Co. v. Basin & Bay State Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Ayers v. BuswellMontana Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Trbovich, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Hart v. HonrudMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Hart v. HonrudMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Turman v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Turman v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API