Ayers v. Buswell
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway
This action was instituted to secure the reformation of a contract and the specific performance of the contract as reformed. The facts out of which the controversy arose are briefly as follows:
In 1908 R. B. Ayers made entry upon public lands of the United States including the south half of the southeast quarter of section 22, township 9 north, range 55 east, in Custer county, and in 1910 received a patent therefor, which patent contained the following reservations: “Reserving also to the United States all coal in the lands so granted and to it or persons authorized by it, the right to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Parchen v. ChessmanMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Allen v. PetrickMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- Craig v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Brundy v. CanbyMontana Supreme Court · 1915
- Parchen v. ChessmanMontana Supreme Court · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Silfvast v. AsplundMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Bickford v. BickfordMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Gould v. FrazierIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
- Vesel v. Polich Trading Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
- Hollensteiner v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.