Clark v. Perez
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
[Wjhere denial of the constitutional right to assistance of counsel is asserted, its peculiar sacredness demands that we scrupulously review the record.
— Avery v. State of Alabama, 308 U.S. 444, 447, 60 S.Ct. 321, 84 L.Ed. 377 (1940).
The Sixth Amendment stands as a constant admonition that if the constitutional safeguards it provides be lost, justice will not ‘still be done.’
— Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 462, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938).
I. INTRODUCTION
Judith Clark seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to section 2254 of Title 28 of the…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Murden v. ArtuzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Clark v. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Davis v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- People v. CohnColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Fong v. PooleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.