Legal Opinion
People v. Palazzolo
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 11, 1975No. Docket 21302PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, P. J.
Defendant was tried before a district judge on a charge of maintaining a pinball machine contrary to Ferndale Ordinance 200, § 2. He was found guilty on February 4, 1974, and sentenced to pay a $100 fine and $4 costs. Defendant appealed to Oakland County Circuit Court. Judgment was affirmed. Defendant now appeals his conviction to this Court by leave granted.
Section 2 of Ferndale Ordinance 200 reads as follows:
"No person, his agent or employee, shall for hire, gain or reward, keep or maintain in a place of business in the City of Ferndale a gaming room or a gaming table or any game of skill…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Fox v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. ChapmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. GouldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Haynes v. Lapeer Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Marshfield Family Skateland, Inc. v. Town of MarshfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- State v. BlossHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- Struble v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Vandolsen Ex Rel. Price v. Constructors, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- Recreational Vehicle United Citizens Ass'n v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.