State v. Bloss
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
LUM, J.
This case involves the constitutionality of a State law prohibiting minors from playing or loitering near pinball machines. Defendant was arrested on November 7,1977 and was charged with violating Section 445-43, Hawaii Revised Statutes, by allowing four minors, unaccompanied by parents, guardians or duly authorized adults, to loiter about or to play “pinball” games as defined in HRS § 445-41. Before trial, defendant filed a motion to dismiss. The district court, finding the statute unconstitutional due to vagueness of the term “to loiter about,” granted the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Richardson v. BelcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. KaakimakaHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Baton Rouge v. RossSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Pickaway County Skilled Gaming, L.L.C. v. CordrayOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Mahiai v. SuwaHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.