Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Borough of Ambridge
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 17, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-167PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LEWIS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Charles M. Marshall, Adminis- • trator of the Estate of Raymond G. Percia-valle, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and asserting pendent state law claims for false arrest, wrongful death and survival.
Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983 provides:
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jordan v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Ford v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Patterson v. Armstrong County Children and Youth ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Green v. City of PatersonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Schor v. NORTH BRADDOCK BOROUGHDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.