Quibell v. Union Pacific Railway Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the first district and from an order refusing a new trial.. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Minee, J.:
This is an action by the respondent for damages for personal injuries received while in the employ of the appellant as a laborer at a coal mine, owned and operated by defendant, situated at Almy, in the state of Wyo*123ming; the injury occurring, as alleged, on the 6th day of December, 1887. The respondent was working during the night, and the cause of action is based upon the alleged negligence of the appellant in neglecting to provide sufficient lights where respondent was working to enable him to perform his service safely, and in carelessly erecting and maintaining a screen and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Carver v. Detroit & Saline Plank Road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Fernandes v. Sacramento City Ry.California Supreme Court · 1877
- Conely v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Bowers v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by5 opinions
- Van Wagoner v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1947
- Wines v. Rio Grande Western Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1893
- Leak v. Rio Grande Western Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1893
- Laub v. San Pedro, L. A. & S. L. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1915
- Saunders v. Southern Pacific Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1896