Wines v. Rio Grande Western Railway Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tbe district court of the first district and from an order refusing a new trial, Hon. John W. Blackburn, judge. The opinion states the facts,
1Opinion of the Court
MINER, J.:
This action was brought to recover damages alleged to have been occasioned by the defendant negligently running its engine and oars, and killing and injuring several horses *230and mules of the plaintiff. The complaint alleges five causes of action. In the first cause of action the plaintiff alleges that the plaintiff was the owner of a certain cow. Second. That he was the owner and possessor of four certain horses in May, 1892, of the value of $460. Third. That in April, 1892, Joseph A. Thomas owned a certain mule of the value of $150. Fourth. That in May, 1892. Michael "Vaughn was the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Anderson v. ReardonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Quibell v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Lowe v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1896
- Nelson v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1944
- Hall v. Ogden City Street Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1896
- Russell/Packard Development, Inc. v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.