Legal Opinion

State v. Vincent

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1994No. 930030PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:

After an evidentiary hearing, the third district court found that Jeffrey Yere Vincent was not indigent under sections 77-32-1 and 78-56-8 of the Utah Code. It therefore denied Vincent’s request for court-appointed counsel and a free transcript on appeal from his theft conviction. The court of appeals reversed, finding that Vincent was indigent. State v. Vincent, 845 P.2d 254, 263 (Utah Ct.App.1992). We granted the State’s petition for a writ of certiorari to address the court of appeals’ approach to indigency determinations. 857 P.2d 948 (Utah 1993). We reverse the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. ThurmanUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. SeryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  5. State v. BrickeyUtah Supreme Court · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Martinez v. Media-Paymaster Plus/Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Drake v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. DoportoUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. ChapmanUtah Supreme Court · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API